Effect of ibandronate on spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

UNLABELLED: Based on this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, ibandronate has no beneficial effect on clinical and radiological outcome in patients with spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee over and above anti-inflammatory medication. INTRODUCTION: Observational studies suggest beneficial effects of bisphosphonates in spontaneous osteonecrosis (ON) of the knee. We investigated whether ibandronate would improve clinical and radiological outcome in newly diagnosed ON. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 30 patients (mean age, 57.3 ± 10.7 years) with ON of the knee were assigned to receive either ibandronate (cumulative dose, 13.5 mg) or placebo intravenously (divided into five doses 12 weeks). All subjects received additional treatment with oral diclofenac (70 mg) and supplementation with calcium carbonate (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU) to be taken daily for 12 weeks. Patients were followed for 48 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in pain score after 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included changes in pain score, mobility, and radiological outcome (MRI) after 48 weeks. RESULTS: At baseline, both treatment groups (IBN, n = 14; placebo, n = 16) were comparable in relation to pain score and radiological grading (bone marrow edema, ON). After 12 weeks, mean pain score was reduced in both ibandronate- (mean change, -2.98; 95% CI, -4.34 to -1.62) and placebo- (-3.59; 95% CI, -5.07 to -2.12) treated subjects (between-group comparison adjusted for age, sex, and osteonecrosis type, p = ns). Except for significant decrease in bone resorption marker (CTX) in ibandronate-treated subjects (p < 0.01), adjusted mean changes in all functional and radiological outcome measures were comparable between treatment groups after 24 and 48 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee, bisphosphonate treatment (i.e., IV ibandronate) has no beneficial effect over and above anti-inflammatory medication.

The effect of intranasal salmon calcitonin on postmenopausal bone turnover as assessed by biochemical markers: evidence of maximal effect after 8 weeks of continuous treatment.

Although treatment with intranasal salmon calcitonin (sCT) has been shown to effectively inhibit postmenopausal bone loss, there is still controversy over both timing and the duration of its application. In an open prospective study, we therefore assessed the effect of shortterm intranasal sCT on postmenopausal bone turnover, employing biochemical markers of bone metabolism. Ten early postmenopausal, previously untreated women (1-5 years after menopause) with biochemical evidence of increased bone resorption and a low bone mineral density at baseline were treated with intranasal sCT (100 IU B.I.D.) for a period of 3 months. Oral calcium (500 mg/day) was administered simultaneously, and during a further 3 month follow-up interval. Treatment with sCT resulted in a pronounced suppression of bone resorption markers with a maximum effect reached after 8 weeks of therapy: as compared to the respective baseline values, mean levels decreased by -26.2% +/- 3.4% (P < 0.001) for pyridinoline, -32.7% +/- 3.5% (P < 0.001) for deoxypyridinoline, -32.7% +/- 3.3% (P < 0.001) for hydroxyproline, and -24.1% +/- 8.2% (P < 0.001) for the amino-terminal telopeptide. In contrast, changes in bone formation markers of osteocalcin (-14.4% +/- 4.8%, P < 0.05) and C-terminal procollagen type I propetide (-7.9% +/- 3.9%, ns) were much less pronounced. Unexpectedly, after week 8 of the study all resorption markers showed a plateau and a trend to increase, although intranasal sCT was continued for a total of 12 weeks. This effect could not be attributed to the formation of anti-sCT antibodies. After cessation of treatment, both bone formation and resorption markers rapidly returned to baseline levels. Bone mineral density of both spine and hip showed no significant change during the observation period. Our results demonstrate that in postmenopausal women with a high bone turnover, intranasal treatment with 200 IU of sCT effectively reduces bone turnover and maintains bone mass, the maximum effect being reached after 8 weeks of treatment.

Fluoride pharmacokinetics in good and poor responders to fluoride therapy.

In this study, the relationship between fluoride pharmacokinetics and the response in spinal bone density to fluoride treatment was studied in 14 patients with primary osteoporosis treated with fluoride for at least 1 year. Serum concentrations and urinary excretion of fluoride were determined after ingestion of 10 mg fluoride as monofluorophosphate. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated according to a linear one-compartment open model. The fasting serum fluoride level was 8.8 +/- 0.98 mumol/liter. The peak serum fluoride level was 20.5 +/- 1.4 mumol/liter and was reached within 2 h after ingestion of fluoride. When the patients were divided into good and poor responders, based on whether they did or did not exhibit a change in spinal bone density of 13 mg/cc per year or more, we found that good responders had decreased renal fluoride clearance (-62 +/- 13%, p less than .02), increased maximum change in serum fluoride (+38 +/- 18%, p less than .01), increased extrarenal clearance (+62 +/- 57%, p less than .05) and increased change in serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (+241 +/- 169%, p less than 0.02) compared with poor responders. Our data suggest that one factor accounting for a good response is a relatively high serum level of fluoride. However, although the maximum change in serum fluoride was greater in good responders compared with poor responders, variations in fluoride levels could not explain all of the variation in spinal bone density. Therefore, we propose that in addition to differences in serum fluoride, other factors are also responsible for the good response.